-Religious conversion has unhappy consequences
January 26, 2011 2:32:58 AM
The Supreme Court’s decision to endorse the Odisha High Court’s judgement against Dara Singh, who has been held guilty of being involved with the murder of Australian missionary Graham Staines and his two sons in January 1999, sentencing him to life imprisonment, brings a ghastly incident that shocked India to a closure. Staines and his two young sons died when the station wagon in which they were sleeping was set on fire by a mob; it was an unconscionable misdeed. Dara Singh and his associate, Mahendra Hembram, richly deserve the punishment that has been meted out to them for their role in that crime. However, the Supreme Court’s lengthy verdict is equally, if not more, important for another reason: It provides a context to the crime that was committed in a remote tribal village of Odisha that January night more than a decade ago. As Friday’s judgement puts it, “The intention was to teach a lesson to Graham Staines about his religious activities, namely, converting poor tribals to Christianity.”
Tragically, the right to freedom of religion, as guaranteed by the Constitution, is interpreted by Christian missionaries and our deracinated Left-liberal commentariat as well as pseudo-secular politicians as the right to convert, more often than not through deceit, fraud and allurement. That this is done by positing one faith as being superior to another is overlooked and those standing up to religious conversion are crudely admonished. It is a reflection of this sad reality that no tears were shed over the brutal slaying of Swami Lakshmanananda who had dedicated his life to tribal welfare and stood up to missionaries looking for souls to harvest at a discounted rate. It is also a telling comment that few have bothered to look at the reasons that led to a virtual tribal uprising in Kandhamal district of Odisha against missionaries and their henchmen in 2008. This is not the first time the courts have wisely warned against the consequences of conversion. But this wisdom has been treated with scorn by missionaries and their patrons. The consequences of this folly are there for all to see.
COMMENTS BOARD ::
The Supreme Court has changed the wordings in the verdict
By Alok on 1/25/2011 4:47:53 PM
If you see the latest news, apparently, the Supreme Court has changed a few sentences in the verdict which spoke with religious conversions.
Begone Churchianity !
By Rajalakshmi on 1/22/2011 5:09:01 PM
The converted indian christians are diabolically wily. They purloin & plagiarise Thirukkural , Thevaram , Kaivalya Navaneetham , Srimad Bhagavatham etc falsely claiming authorship over them . Where have they not made inroads in our country ? Temples , educational institutions , media , kollywood , DMK , ADMK , Kerala ,Congress ....
By Kumar on 1/22/2011 1:40:20 PM
Semetic Religions, especially Christianity, is highly Christianity is highly intolerant and expresses that in highly sophisticated ways. The Staines are here as part of a large campaign to "conquer Asia in the 3rd Millenium", there are huge websites running counters with 'more to go'. Jihadi Terrorism and Christian Evangelism are singularly responsible for tearing the world apart!!
Tares among the Harvest
By Ravi P on 1/22/2011 1:35:08 AM
In the statement, “The intention was to teach a lesson to Graham Staines about his religious activities, namely, converting poor tribals to Christianity”, the court seems to be giving the possible reason for the beastly act of burning life. I dont see it as a scathing comment on the right to preach, proclaim, and practice any faith without applying force and calling one religion superior than other.
Each faith is different and may have tenants that are contrast to each other.